No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed the Benefits Review Board's decision awarding black lung benefits to Billy D. Williams under the Federal Coal Mine Health & Safety Act, rejecting Consolidation Coal Company's petition for review and upholding the ALJ's determination that Williams suffered from coal worker's pneumoconiosis.
What Happened
Billy D. Williams, a coal miner, developed black lung disease (coal worker's pneumoconiosis) from years of breathing coal dust while working for Consolidation Coal Company. Williams applied for federal black lung benefits under the Federal Coal Mine Health & Safety Act. Consolidation Coal Company challenged his claim, arguing that Williams didn't actually have the disease or that it wasn't caused by his coal mining work.
What the Court Decided
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Williams' favor, upholding his right to receive black lung benefits. The court affirmed earlier decisions by both an administrative law judge and the Benefits Review Board that found Williams did indeed suffer from coal worker's pneumoconiosis caused by his mining work. The court rejected Consolidation Coal Company's appeal and confirmed that Williams was entitled to compensation.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces important protections for coal miners who develop occupational lung diseases. It shows that courts will carefully review medical evidence and support workers' claims when employers try to deny benefits for work-related illnesses. The decision helps ensure that the federal black lung benefits program continues to provide crucial financial support to miners whose health has been damaged by dangerous working conditions.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.