Skip to main content

Diamond v. Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund

U.S. Supreme CourtJune 8, 2015No. 14-1193
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
Circuit
2nd Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, leaving the Second Circuit's decision undisturbed. The merits of the underlying dispute are not addressed in this order.

What This Ruling Means

**Diamond v. Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund: Supreme Court Decision Summary** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Diamond and a labor union pension fund called Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund. The specific details of what Diamond was claiming against the pension fund are not clear from the available court records, but it involved employment-related issues. The case worked its way up through the court system, and Diamond asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision made by a lower appeals court (the Second Circuit). However, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case in June 2015. When the Supreme Court "denies certiorari," it means they choose not to review the case, which leaves the lower court's ruling in place. Since the Supreme Court didn't review the case on its merits, we don't know what the underlying dispute was specifically about or how it was resolved. **What this means for workers:** This case shows that even when workers have disputes with pension funds or unions, getting the Supreme Court to review their case is difficult. Most employment disputes are resolved at lower court levels. Workers should understand that pension fund disputes can be complex and may require working through multiple levels of courts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.