Skip to main content

Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission

WISCTAPPMarch 8, 2017No. No. 2016AP1365Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gundrum, Neubauer, Reilly
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed the circuit court and upheld the Labor and Industry Review Commission's interpretation that employers cannot enforce absenteeism policies more restrictive than the statutory default of 2 absences in 120 days, thus allowing the employee to receive unemployment benefits despite termination.

What This Ruling Means

# What This Court Case Means for Workers **What Happened** An employee at Mequon Jewish Campus was fired for missing work too often. The employer had an absenteeism policy, and the employee was terminated for violating it. The worker then applied for unemployment benefits, but the Department of Workforce Development denied the claim, arguing the termination was for legitimate misconduct. **What the Court Decided** Wisconsin's Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the employee. The court determined that employers cannot create stricter absence policies than what state law allows. State law sets a baseline: workers can miss up to 2 days of work within a 120-day period without it counting as misconduct. Since the employer's policy was tougher than this legal standard, the termination was not valid grounds to deny unemployment benefits. **Why This Matters** This ruling protects workers from arbitrary firing based on overly strict absence rules. Employers must follow Wisconsin's legal attendance standards rather than enforce their own harsher policies. Workers who are fired under policies stricter than the law allows may still qualify for unemployment benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.