J.B. v. O.S.Y.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Forbes
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The appellate court reversed the trial court's civil stalking protection order against J.D., finding insufficient evidence of stalking or threat of bodily harm based on his participation in organized protests.
Excerpt
Civil stalking protection order competent and credible evidence abuse of discretion menacing by stalking pattern of conduct knowingly cause. Trial court abused its discretion by granted a civil stalking protection order against the appellant, because the evidence presented at the hearings did not amount to menacing by stalking in violation of R.C. 2903.211(A)(1). The appellee's testimony concerned protests against her employer's business, at which the appellant was present as a protester. There was no evidence that appellant engaged in a pattern of conduct that knowingly caused the appellee to believe that the appellant will cause her physical harm or caused her mental distress. Judgment reversed.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.