Skip to main content

Bauserman v. Unemployment Ins. Agency

MICHApril 5, 2019No. No. 156389Cited 33 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Markman, McCormack
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Michigan Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the Court of Appeals decision, holding that due-process claims for monetary relief accrue when property is actually seized or garnished, not when redetermination notices are issued. Plaintiffs Bauserman and Broe timely filed within six months of their property seizure, but plaintiff Williams did not, making his claim subject to governmental immunity.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Three workers - Bauserman, Broe, and Williams - sued the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency after the agency seized money from their bank accounts to recover unemployment benefits it claimed were overpaid. The workers argued the agency violated their rights by taking their money without proper legal procedures (due process violations) and that the seizures were wrongful. **What the Court Decided** The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that workers have six months from when their property is actually seized to file a lawsuit - not from when they first receive notices about benefit overpayments. Two of the workers (Bauserman and Broe) filed their lawsuits within six months of the seizure, so their cases could proceed. However, Williams waited too long after his money was seized, so his case was dismissed under governmental immunity rules. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling clarifies an important deadline for workers whose money is seized by unemployment agencies. If you believe the agency wrongfully took money from your accounts, you must file a lawsuit within six months of the actual seizure - not from when you received paperwork about overpayments. Acting quickly after a seizure is crucial to preserve your legal rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Bauserman from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.