Bauserman v. Unemployment Ins. Agency
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Markman, McCormack
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The Michigan Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the Court of Appeals decision, holding that due-process claims for monetary relief accrue when property is actually seized or garnished, not when redetermination notices are issued. Plaintiffs Bauserman and Broe timely filed within six months of their property seizure, but plaintiff Williams did not, making his claim subject to governmental immunity.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Bauserman from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.