Skip to main content

Wilfert Bros. Realty v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

MASSSUPERCTFebruary 7, 2007No. No. 022671
Plaintiff WinWilfert Brothers Realty Co.$31,241 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Neel, Stephen
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Plaintiff Keeling, who prevailed before the MCAD on a disability discrimination claim, was awarded $31,241 in attorneys fees on his petition against employer Wilfert Brothers, with the court excluding fees related to appellate motions and the writ of certiorari.

What This Ruling Means

**The Dispute** An employee named Keeling filed a disability discrimination complaint against his employer, Wilfert Brothers Realty Company, with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD). The MCAD is the state agency that handles workplace discrimination cases. Keeling won his discrimination case, proving that his employer had illegally discriminated against him because of his disability. **The Court's Decision** After winning his discrimination case, Keeling asked the court to order his former employer to pay his attorney fees. The court agreed and awarded Keeling $31,241 to cover the legal costs of fighting his discrimination case. However, the court excluded certain fees related to appeals and other court motions that came after the main case. **What This Means for Workers** This ruling shows that employees who successfully prove workplace discrimination may be able to recover their attorney fees from their employer. This is important because discrimination lawsuits can be expensive, and many workers might not be able to afford legal representation otherwise. Knowing that winning plaintiffs can potentially get their legal costs covered makes it more feasible for workers to stand up against discrimination and seek justice when their rights are violated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.