Skip to main content

Aja Termine ex rel. Termine v. William S. Hart Union High School District

9th CircuitJanuary 9, 2004No. No. 02-56638
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Farris, Fletcher, Wardlaw
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the district court, directing it to vacate its stay-put placement denial order and reconsider the issue in light of the full factual record developed by the special education hearing officer.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** This case involved a dispute between a student's family and the William S. Hart Union High School District over special education services. The family believed the school district failed to provide proper accommodations for their child with disabilities. When disagreements arose about the student's educational placement and services, the family pursued legal action claiming the district wasn't meeting their legal obligations under disability laws. **What the court decided:** The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to the lower court with specific instructions. The appeals court told the district court to cancel its previous order denying the student's "stay-put" placement and to reconsider the entire situation. The court wanted the lower court to review all the evidence that had been gathered by a special education hearing officer before making a new decision. **Why this matters for workers:** While this case specifically involved a student, it demonstrates how courts handle disability accommodation disputes. For workers with disabilities, this shows that courts take accommodation failures seriously and will ensure cases receive proper review when employers or institutions may not be meeting their legal duties to provide reasonable accommodations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.