Skip to main content

Laborers' Pension Fund v. Miscevic

7th CircuitJanuary 29, 2018No. No. 17-2022Cited 20 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Flaum, Kanne, Rovner
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment that the Illinois slayer statute bars Anka Miscevic from receiving her deceased husband's pension benefits, holding that ERISA does not preempt state slayer statutes and that the statute applies even to those found not guilty by reason of insanity.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Anka Miscevic tried to claim her deceased husband's pension benefits from the Laborers' Pension Fund. However, there was a significant problem: she had killed her husband, though she was found not guilty by reason of insanity. Illinois has a "slayer statute" - a law that prevents people from inheriting money or benefits when they kill the person those benefits come from. The pension fund refused to pay her the benefits, and she sued them. **What the Court Decided** The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Miscevic. The court said that Illinois's slayer statute applies even when someone is found not guilty by reason of insanity. The court also determined that federal pension law (ERISA) doesn't override state slayer statutes, so the pension fund was right to deny her the benefits. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling clarifies that pension benefits can be denied when someone kills the person those benefits come from, even in cases involving mental illness. It shows that state laws preventing killers from profiting financially still apply to workplace pension plans, protecting the integrity of these benefit systems for all workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.