Skip to main content

State v. U.S. Dep't of Labor

5th CircuitJuly 2, 2019No. No. 18-40246Cited 12 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Dennis, Higginson, Jolly
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Texas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit reversed the district court's contempt order against Alvarez and her attorneys, holding that they were not in privity with the DOL and therefore not bound by the injunction against the FLSA Overtime Rule. The court rendered judgment in favor of Alvarez and her counsel, including vacating the attorneys' fees award.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Protects Workers' Right to Sue Separately from Government Cases** This case involved a dispute over whether workers could file their own lawsuits for unpaid wages while the Department of Labor was already investigating the same employer, Chipotle Mexican Grill. A Texas federal court had previously issued an order that seemed to prevent individual workers from suing Chipotle while the government's case was ongoing. When worker Carmen Alvarez and her lawyers filed a separate lawsuit anyway, the lower court held them in contempt for violating this order. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned this contempt ruling. The court decided that the Texas federal court did not have the authority to punish Alvarez and her attorneys because they were not part of the original government case. The court explained that since Alvarez was not bound by the earlier court order, she had every right to file her own lawsuit. This decision matters because it protects workers' fundamental right to pursue their own legal remedies for wage theft, even when the government is already taking action against the same employer. Workers don't have to wait for government investigations to conclude before seeking justice for unpaid wages through their own lawsuits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.