Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. Atlantic Veal & Lamb, Inc.

2nd CircuitDecember 10, 2013No. No. 12-3485-ag
Mixed ResultAtlantic Veal & Lamb, Inc.$4,001.04 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Livingston, Newman, Pooler
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted the NLRB's petition for enforcement of backpay awards for the first supplemental order and for the last quarter of 2001 ($4,001.04), but denied enforcement for the period January 1, 2002 through June 7, 2004, finding that the employer established the employee willfully concealed interim earnings.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved a dispute between the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Atlantic Veal & Lamb, Inc., a meat processing company, over unfair labor practices. **What happened:** The NLRB, which is the federal agency that protects workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively, filed charges against Atlantic Veal & Lamb for violating labor laws. While the specific details of what the company did wrong aren't provided, unfair labor practice cases typically involve employers interfering with workers' rights to form unions, discuss workplace conditions, or engage in other protected activities. **What the court decided:** The specific outcome of this 2013 case from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals is not detailed in the available information. **Why this matters for workers:** NLRB cases are important because they help establish and enforce workers' fundamental rights in the workplace. When the NLRB takes action against employers, it sends a message that companies cannot violate federal labor laws without consequences. These cases help protect workers' rights to organize, speak up about workplace problems, and engage in collective bargaining. Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case represents the ongoing effort to ensure employers follow labor laws that protect worker rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.