Skip to main content

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Apparel, Inc.

9th CircuitApril 22, 2009No. No. 08-55262
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Harassment

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's order directing American Apparel to comply with an EEOC administrative subpoena and remanded for the district court to reconsider whether the requested documents are protected by attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine.

What This Ruling Means

**EEOC Investigation vs. American Apparel Document Fight** This case involved a dispute over documents during an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) investigation into harassment claims at American Apparel. The EEOC was investigating allegations of workplace harassment and issued a subpoena demanding that American Apparel turn over certain internal documents. American Apparel refused to provide some documents, claiming they were protected because they involved private communications between the company and its lawyers. A lower court initially ordered American Apparel to hand over all the requested documents to the EEOC. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this decision and sent the case back to the lower court. The appeals court said the lower court needed to take another look and decide whether some of the documents should actually remain private due to attorney-client privilege or other legal protections. **What this means for workers:** When you file harassment complaints, federal agencies like the EEOC can investigate and demand company documents as evidence. However, companies can sometimes keep certain lawyer communications private, which might limit what investigators can access. This case shows that the scope of workplace investigations can involve complex legal battles over what evidence becomes available.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Harassment cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.