Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. Local One-L, Amalgamated Lithographers of America

2nd CircuitSeptember 1, 2009No. No. 08-5163-ag
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Livingston, Lynch, Pooler
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The National Labor Relations Board's petition for enforcement was granted. The court upheld the Board's finding that Local One-L violated Section 8(b)(3) of the NLRA by refusing to provide requested information relevant to administering the collective bargaining agreement.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules Union Must Share Information for Contract Administration** This case involved a dispute between the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Local One-L, a union representing printing workers. The union refused to provide certain information that was needed to properly manage and enforce the collective bargaining agreement between the union and employers. The NLRB argued this refusal violated federal labor law. The court sided with the NLRB and ordered the union to comply. The judges upheld the labor board's finding that Local One-L broke the law by refusing to share requested information that was relevant to administering the collective bargaining agreement. Under federal labor law, unions have a legal duty to provide information necessary for contract administration when properly requested. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces that unions must be transparent and cooperative in managing collective bargaining agreements. When unions withhold important information, it can make it harder to enforce contract terms and protect worker rights. The decision helps ensure that the bargaining process works effectively by requiring all parties - including unions - to share relevant information needed to make collective bargaining agreements work properly for everyone involved.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.