Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. Local One-L, Amalgamated Lithographers of America

2nd CircuitSeptember 1, 2009No. No. 08-5163-ag
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Livingston, Lynch, Pooler
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The National Labor Relations Board's petition for enforcement was granted. The court upheld the Board's finding that Local One-L violated Section 8(b)(3) of the NLRA by refusing to provide the Metropolitan Lithographers Association with information relevant to administering their collective bargaining agreement.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules Union Must Share Information for Contract Administration** This case involved a dispute between the National Labor Relations Board and Local One-L, a union representing lithographers (printing workers). The union had a collective bargaining agreement with the Metropolitan Lithographers Association, which represents employers in the printing industry. When the employers' association asked the union for certain information needed to properly manage and follow their contract, the union refused to provide it. The court sided with the National Labor Relations Board and ordered the union to comply. The judge found that Local One-L violated federal labor law by refusing to share information that was relevant to administering their collective bargaining agreement. Under the National Labor Relations Act, unions have a legal duty to provide employers with information necessary to properly implement the terms of their contracts. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that both unions and employers must cooperate in good faith when managing workplace contracts. When unions withhold necessary information, it can undermine the effectiveness of collective bargaining agreements. Workers benefit when their union representatives work transparently with employers to ensure contracts are properly administered, as this helps protect the wages, benefits, and working conditions that were negotiated on their behalf.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.