County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Scheindlin
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Defendants' motion for summary judgment was partially denied and partially granted. The court denied summary judgment on plaintiffs' TSCA section 8(e) claims regarding notification of MTBE spills, remediation information, and taste/odor studies, but granted summary judgment against the portion of the claim concerning defendants' potential liability information.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.