United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Gorman
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- jury verdict
- State
- Illinois
- Circuit
- Seventh Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The EEOC prevailed on an ADA failure-to-accommodate claim against AutoZone. A jury found that Shepherd was a qualified individual with a disability, that AutoZone was aware of his disability, and that AutoZone failed to reasonably accommodate it. The jury awarded $100,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages. The court denied AutoZone's motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for new trial.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.