Skip to main content

Grossman v. Trans Union, LLC

E.D. Pa.January 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-01703Cited 14 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Robreno
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted Ocwen's motion to dismiss Counts VI, IX, XI, and XIII of the plaintiff's amended complaint, finding that these state law claims (defamation, unfair trade practices violation, negligence, and invasion of privacy) were preempted by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** An employee sued their former employer, Ocwen Loan Servicing, claiming the company damaged their reputation through defamation, broke their contract, acted carelessly, and violated their privacy. The worker also sued Trans Union, a credit reporting company. The case involved disputes over how the employer handled the worker's personal information and potentially shared false or damaging information about them. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed several of the worker's claims against Ocwen. The judge ruled that federal law—specifically the Fair Credit Reporting Act—takes priority over state laws in this situation. This meant the worker couldn't pursue their defamation, negligence, unfair trade practices, and privacy invasion claims under state law because federal credit reporting rules already cover these issues. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that when employers handle your credit information or share financial data about you with credit reporting agencies, federal law usually controls what you can and cannot sue for. Workers should know that if they believe an employer wrongfully shared their credit information, they may need to focus on federal Fair Credit Reporting Act violations rather than traditional state law claims like defamation or privacy violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.