Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kansas City Southern Railway

D. Kan.June 28, 2000No. No. 99-2512-GTVCited 7 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Waxse
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Kansas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted in part and denied in part the EEOC's motion to compel discovery. The defendant was ordered to respond to Interrogatory 12 for a limited time period (December 1994 to December 1998) rather than the full 10-year period requested.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules on Information Gathering in Railroad Discrimination Case** The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Kansas City Southern Railway over alleged workplace discrimination. During the lawsuit, the EEOC wanted the railroad company to provide detailed information about its employment practices over a 10-year period to help prove their case. The railroad resisted, arguing this request was too broad and burdensome. The court reached a compromise decision. It ordered Kansas City Southern Railway to provide the requested information, but only for a shorter time period - from December 1994 to December 1998 (4 years) instead of the full 10 years the EEOC wanted. The court granted part of the EEOC's request while also limiting its scope. This ruling matters for workers because it shows how courts balance different interests in discrimination cases. While employers can't completely avoid providing information about their workplace practices when facing discrimination lawsuits, courts will consider whether requests for information are reasonable in scope. For workers filing discrimination complaints, this demonstrates that getting access to company records is possible, though courts may limit how much information must be shared based on what's fair and necessary to resolve the case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.