Skip to main content

Kress v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

E.D. Cal.November 25, 2009No. No. CIV. S-08-0965 LKK/GGHCited 11 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
263 F.R.D. 623, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117949, 2009 WL 4269465
Judge(s)
Karlton
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court denied plaintiff's motion to proceed pseudonymously at trial. Plaintiff was required to disclose her identity to proceed with the remaining battery claim against Delta Airlines, with the court finding that the public interest in open judicial proceedings and the defendant's interest in confronting an identified accuser outweighed the plaintiff's privacy concerns about professional embarrassment.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker's Identity Must Be Public in Battery Lawsuit Against Employer** A worker sued Delta Airlines for battery and wanted to keep her name secret during the trial. The employee was concerned that having her name publicly connected to the lawsuit would hurt her professional reputation and cause embarrassment. The court said no to her request to remain anonymous. The judge ruled that she must reveal her identity to continue with her battery claim against Delta Airlines. The court explained that the public has a right to know what happens in court proceedings, and Delta Airlines has the right to face an accuser whose identity they know. These interests were more important than the worker's concerns about professional embarrassment. **What This Means for Workers:** If you sue your employer, you generally cannot hide your identity from the public. Courts usually require plaintiffs to use their real names in lawsuits, even when workers worry about damage to their reputation or career prospects. While there are rare exceptions for cases involving highly sensitive matters, courts typically prioritize transparency in legal proceedings. Workers considering legal action should be prepared for their case to become public record with their name attached.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.