Skip to main content

Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. D & M Property Maintenance, Inc.

D.C. CircuitJanuary 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-1518 (CKK)
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kollar, Kotelly
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted the plaintiff's motion for partial default judgment, ordering the defendant to submit delinquent remittance reports for December 2011 through November 2012 and retaining jurisdiction to enter final judgment on contributions, supplemental contributions, interest, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees once reports are submitted.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Pension Fund vs. Property Maintenance Company** This case involved a dispute between the Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund and D & M Property Maintenance, Inc. The union's pension fund filed a lawsuit against the property maintenance company, likely over unpaid contributions to employee pension benefits. These types of cases typically arise when employers fail to make required payments into union pension funds as agreed upon in collective bargaining agreements or as required by law. The case was heard by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in January 2014. However, the specific outcome and court's decision are not detailed in the available information, so the final ruling and any monetary damages awarded remain unclear. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the ongoing legal battles over employee pension benefits and retirement security. When employers don't pay required pension contributions, it can jeopardize workers' retirement funds. Union pension funds actively pursue legal action to protect members' benefits, demonstrating that there are enforcement mechanisms in place. Workers should understand that their pension rights are legally protected, and unions will fight in court to ensure employers meet their obligations to fund promised retirement benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.