No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court granted plaintiff's motion to compel Experian to produce a corporate representative and provide information about lawsuits and mixed files, but allowed defendant to provide approximations if exact numbers were unavailable.
The Dispute
This case involved a worker named Montelongo who sued Trans Union LLC for allegedly failing to provide reasonable accommodations for a disability. During the lawsuit, Montelongo's legal team requested that Experian Information, Inc. (which appeared to be connected to the case) provide specific information and send a company representative to answer questions under oath. This is a common part of the legal discovery process where both sides gather evidence.
The Court's Decision
The court issued a mixed ruling. It sided with Montelongo by ordering Experian to provide a corporate representative who could answer questions about the company's practices. The court also required Experian to share information about related lawsuits and problematic files. However, the court gave Experian some flexibility by allowing them to provide approximate numbers if they couldn't locate exact figures.
What This Means for Workers
This ruling shows that courts will help workers obtain important information from companies during disability accommodation lawsuits. When employers or related companies try to avoid providing evidence, workers can ask courts to force cooperation. This strengthens workers' ability to build their cases and hold employers accountable for accommodation failures.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.