Skip to main content

State Ex Rel. North Dakota Department of Labor for the Benefit of Fair Housing of the Dakotas v. Riemers

N.D.October 24, 2008No. 20070363Cited 21 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kapsner, Vande Walle, Sandstrom, Crothers, Maring
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The North Dakota Supreme Court affirmed the district court's default judgment against Roland Riemers for violating state fair housing advertising laws by publishing an advertisement discriminating against persons receiving public assistance.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved Roland Riemers, who was connected to Affordable Apartments, LLC. The North Dakota Department of Labor brought a lawsuit on behalf of Fair Housing of the Dakotas, claiming that Riemers published a housing advertisement that illegally discriminated against people who receive government assistance (like housing vouchers or welfare benefits). Under North Dakota law, landlords cannot advertise rental properties in ways that exclude people based on their source of income, including public assistance. **What the Court Decided** The North Dakota Supreme Court ruled against Riemers. The court upheld a default judgment, meaning Riemers failed to properly defend himself in court, and the lower court had already found him guilty of violating state fair housing advertising laws. The Supreme Court agreed that the advertisement was discriminatory and broke the law. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers and other residents who rely on government assistance programs. It confirms that landlords cannot publish ads that exclude people simply because they receive public benefits. This is especially important for low-wage workers who may qualify for housing assistance or other government programs to help make ends meet.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.