Skip to main content

Franklin & Marshall College v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

U.S. Supreme CourtJune 2, 1986No. No. 85-1439Cited 32 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Blackmun, White, Whom
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Supreme Court review of EEOC enforcement procedures
Circuit
Federal Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Supreme Court case regarding Franklin & Marshall College's dispute with the EEOC over employment discrimination investigation procedures and record-keeping requirements.

What This Ruling Means

**Franklin & Marshall College v. EEOC (1986)** This case involved a dispute between Franklin & Marshall College and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) over how workplace discrimination investigations should be conducted and what employment records employers must provide during these investigations. The college challenged the EEOC's authority to demand certain employment records and questioned the procedures the agency used when investigating discrimination complaints. The college argued that some of the EEOC's record-keeping requirements and investigation methods went beyond what federal law allowed. The Supreme Court issued a mixed ruling, upholding some aspects of the EEOC's authority while limiting others. The Court clarified which employment records employers must turn over during discrimination investigations and established clearer boundaries for how these investigations should proceed. **What this means for workers:** This decision helped define the rules that govern how discrimination complaints are investigated in the workplace. While the ruling placed some limits on the EEOC's investigative powers, it also confirmed that employers cannot simply refuse to cooperate with discrimination investigations. Workers filing discrimination complaints can expect that employers must provide certain employment records to investigators, though the scope of that requirement has specific legal boundaries.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.