Skip to main content

Barberis v. Retirement Plan for Employees of S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

U.S. Supreme CourtApril 16, 2012No. 11-843Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Supreme Court appeal addressing ERISA plan interpretation; case remanded for reconsideration
Circuit
Federal Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Court addressed ERISA plan interpretation issues regarding pension plan calculations and benefit determinations, resulting in a partial reversal and remand for further proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

# Barberis v. S.C. Johnson Retirement Plan ## What Happened An employee named Barberis disputed how S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. calculated his pension benefits. The disagreement centered on how the company's retirement plan determined the amount of money he was entitled to receive. ## What the Court Decided The U.S. Supreme Court partially sided with Barberis. The justices found that some aspects of how the company calculated benefits needed to be reconsidered. However, they didn't completely rule in his favor—instead, they sent the case back to a lower court to review certain issues more carefully. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling clarifies important rules about how companies must calculate pension benefits under federal retirement plan laws. It shows that workers can challenge pension calculations if they believe the math is wrong. While the Supreme Court didn't award Barberis a specific amount of money in this decision, the ruling protects workers' rights to question how their retirement benefits are computed and ensures companies follow proper procedures when calculating what employees are owed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.