Colerain Twp. v. AFSCME Ohio Council 8, AFL-CIO, Local 3553
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Zayas
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appellate reversal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The appellate court reversed the trial court's vacation of an arbitrator's award, holding that the arbitrator properly awarded reinstatement and back pay to a township employee terminated in violation of the collective bargaining agreement.
Excerpt
R.C. 2711.10(D) — ARBITRATION — COLLECTIVE-BARGAINING AGREEMENT: In a dispute concerning a township employee's termination, the trial court erred in vacating the arbitrator's award of reinstatement and making the employee whole under R.C. 2711.10(D) where nothing in the collective-bargaining agreement prevented the arbitrator from awarding any remedy inherent within the relief requested in the employee's written grievance in order to provide the employee with a full and adequate remedy under the provision of the collective-bargaining agreement relevant to the arbitrator's decision. The trial court erred in vacating the arbitrator's award under R.C. 2711.10(D) where it vacated the award due to a perceived error in the arbitrator's exercise of her powers under the collective-bargaining agreement.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.