Skip to main content

Storer v. Natl. Coop. Bank

Ohio Ct. App.April 26, 2024No. 23CA8Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hess
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationDiscrimination

Outcome

The trial court's dismissal of Storer's wrongful termination and pregnancy discrimination claims was affirmed on appeal. Storer failed to allege a clear public policy violation for the wrongful termination claim and failed to allege sufficient facts to support her pregnancy discrimination claim.

Excerpt

Civ.R. 12(B)(6) failure to state a claim wrongful termination clear public policy pregnancy discrimination temporal nexus

What This Ruling Means

# Storer v. National Cooperative Bank Summary **What Happened** Storer was employed by National Cooperative Bank and claimed she was wrongfully fired because of her pregnancy. She sued the bank for wrongful termination and pregnancy discrimination, alleging that her dismissal violated Ohio employment law. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court sided with the bank and upheld the lower court's dismissal of both claims. The court found that Storer did not provide enough evidence to prove her case. Specifically, she failed to show that her firing violated a clear public policy protecting pregnant workers, and she did not present sufficient facts to support her pregnancy discrimination claim. No damages were awarded. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights how difficult it can be to win wrongful termination suits in Ohio. Workers claiming pregnancy discrimination must gather solid evidence connecting their firing directly to their pregnancy status. Simply being pregnant and then fired is not automatically enough—workers need to demonstrate clear facts showing the employer's discriminatory intent. Those facing similar situations should consult employment lawyers early to determine whether they have sufficient evidence for a viable claim.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.