No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Secretary of Labor prevailed against Valley Wide Plastering Construction in a Fair Labor Standards Act enforcement action regarding wage and hour violations.
Construction Company Violated Workers' Wage Rights
The U.S. Department of Labor sued Valley Wide Plastering Construction Incorporated for breaking federal wage laws. The company was accused of stealing wages from workers, not paying required overtime rates, and failing to pay minimum wage as required by law.
Court Decision
The court ruled in favor of the Department of Labor, finding that Valley Wide Plastering Construction had indeed violated the Fair Labor Standards Act. This federal law sets rules for minimum wage and overtime pay that employers must follow. The company was held responsible for these wage and hour violations.
What This Means for Workers
This case shows that the government will take action against employers who cheat workers out of proper pay. Construction workers and others in similar industries should know that federal law requires:
- Payment of at least minimum wage for all hours worked
- Overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked beyond 40 in a week
- Proper record-keeping of work hours
Workers who suspect their employer is violating wage laws can file complaints with the Department of Labor, which has the power to investigate and take legal action against violators.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Valley Wide Plastering Construction Incorporated from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.