Skip to main content

Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Valley Wide Plastering Construction Incorporated

D. Ariz.February 23, 2021No. 2:18-cv-04756
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Appeal before 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
State
Arizona

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Secretary of Labor's wage theft claims against Valley Wide Plastering Construction were dismissed or found insufficient on appeal, with the defendant prevailing in the 9th Circuit decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Labor Department Loses Wage Theft Case Against Construction Company** The U.S. Department of Labor sued Valley Wide Plastering Construction Incorporated in 2021, claiming the company violated federal wage laws by not paying workers properly. The Labor Department alleged the construction company failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act, which requires employers to pay minimum wage and overtime to eligible workers. However, the court ruled in favor of Valley Wide Plastering. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed or rejected the Labor Department's wage theft claims, finding them insufficient. This means the construction company won the case and avoided penalties. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling shows that even when the federal government brings a case against an employer for wage violations, success isn't guaranteed. Workers should understand that wage theft cases can be complex and require strong evidence to prove violations occurred. While this particular case didn't result in recovered wages for workers, it doesn't change employers' legal obligations to pay minimum wage and overtime. Workers who believe their wages have been stolen should still document their hours carefully and consider filing complaints, as each case depends on its specific facts and evidence.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.