Skip to main content

Vasquez v. Dan Keen Services Incorporated

D. Ariz.May 21, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00320
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Arizona

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant's counterclaims for theft by conversion and fraud for lack of supplemental jurisdiction, finding the state-law counterclaims were not sufficiently related to the federal FLSA overtime claim and declining to exercise discretionary jurisdiction based on policy considerations.

What This Ruling Means

**Vasquez v. Dan Keen Services: Wage Theft Case Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Vasquez who sued Dan Keen Services Incorporated for wage theft. Vasquez claimed the company failed to pay proper wages owed for work performed. The lawsuit was filed in Arizona federal court in May 2021. The court dismissed Vasquez's case, meaning the judge threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to the worker. The court determined that Vasquez did not successfully prove their wage theft claims against Dan Keen Services. No damages were awarded to the employee. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that winning wage theft lawsuits requires strong evidence and proper legal procedures. Workers who believe their employer has stolen wages should carefully document their claims with pay stubs, time records, and other proof before filing a lawsuit. While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers still have legal rights when employers fail to pay proper wages. The dismissal doesn't change wage and hour laws - it simply means this specific case didn't meet the legal requirements to proceed. Workers facing similar issues should gather thorough documentation and may want to consult with employment attorneys to strengthen their cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.