Skip to main content

Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Valley Wide Plastering Construction Incorporated

D. Ariz.May 5, 2022No. 2:18-cv-04756
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Appeal/Enforcement proceeding - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
State
Arizona

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court rejected the Department of Labor's wage and hour claims against Valley Wide Plastering Construction, finding insufficient evidence of Fair Labor Standards Act violations.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rejects Labor Department's Wage Theft Claims Against Construction Company** The U.S. Department of Labor sued Valley Wide Plastering Construction, claiming the company violated federal wage laws by not properly paying workers and failing to provide required overtime compensation. The government alleged the construction company broke the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets rules for minimum wage and overtime pay. The court sided with Valley Wide Plastering Construction and rejected all of the Labor Department's claims. The judge found that the government did not provide enough evidence to prove the company actually violated wage and hour laws. As a result, the company won the case and faced no penalties or requirement to pay back wages. This ruling matters for workers because it shows how challenging it can be to prove wage theft cases in court. Even when the federal government brings a lawsuit, employers can successfully defend themselves if there isn't sufficient evidence of wrongdoing. Workers should keep detailed records of their hours worked and pay received, as documentation is crucial in wage disputes. The case also demonstrates that not all wage theft allegations result in victory for workers, even with government backing.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.