Heikkia v. Avnet Incorporated
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Arizona
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The parties settled a Fair Labor Standards Act wage and overtime dispute. The court approved a settlement agreement whereby the defendant agreed to pay $30,000 total to resolve all claims, with the plaintiffs receiving $9,500 combined and their attorneys receiving $20,500 in fees and costs.
What This Ruling Means
Heikkia v. Avnet Incorporated: Settlement Overview
What Happened
A group of workers filed a lawsuit against Avnet Incorporated claiming the company failed to pay them properly for their work. The workers alleged wage theft—meaning the employer didn't pay them all the wages or overtime they earned under federal labor law.
What the Court Decided
Rather than go to trial, both sides agreed to settle the dispute. Avnet agreed to pay $30,000 total to resolve all claims. Of this amount, the workers received $9,500 combined, while their lawyers received $20,500 to cover legal fees and costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers can take legal action when they believe they haven't been paid fairly. Even when cases settle rather than go to trial, companies may still be required to compensate employees. If you believe your employer has withheld pay or failed to pay overtime properly, you have options to pursue a claim and recover what you're owed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.