Craven v. Neeley's Service Center, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Arkansas
- Circuit
- Eighth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement resolving FLSA, AMWA, ADA, Title VII, and ACRA claims. Plaintiff's claims were dismissed with prejudice after the parties reached a settlement.
What This Ruling Means
Craven v. Neeley's Service Center, Inc.
What Happened
A worker named Craven filed a lawsuit against Neeley's Service Center, Inc., claiming the employer violated their legal rights. The dispute involved wage theft (not paying required wages), discrimination, and disability-related violations.
What the Court Decided
Rather than going to trial, both sides agreed to settle the case. A court approved their settlement agreement in August 2021. The lawsuit was dismissed, meaning the case is now closed. No specific damages amount was publicly reported.
Why This Matters for Workers
This settlement shows that workers have legal options when employers violate wage and discrimination laws. Even without a public trial or stated dollar amount, reaching a settlement means the worker likely recovered compensation. The case involved multiple federal laws protecting workers' rights—including wage protection and disability discrimination protections—demonstrating that employers can be held accountable on multiple legal grounds. Workers facing similar situations should know they can pursue claims through the court system, sometimes leading to negotiated resolutions.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.