Mario Cortez v. Vieira Custom Chopping, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- California
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court granted preliminary approval of a class and collective action settlement in which defendants agreed to pay a maximum of $450,000 to resolve claims for FLSA violations, meal and rest period violations, wage statement violations, and PAGA claims.
What This Ruling Means
Court Settlement Summary: Cortez v. Vieira Custom Chopping, Inc.
What Happened
Mario Cortez sued his employer, Vieira Custom Chopping, Inc., claiming the company violated wage laws by not paying workers properly and failing to give required meal and rest breaks. The case also raised concerns about inaccurate pay stubs and other compensation violations.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement requiring the company to pay $450,000 to resolve all claims. This was a class and collective action settlement, meaning the payment covers not just Cortez but other workers who experienced similar issues at the company.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that employers can face significant financial consequences for wage theft and violating break requirements. The settlement shows courts will hold companies accountable when they fail to provide accurate pay information or deny required rest periods. For workers at similar companies, this ruling reinforces that wage violations are serious legal violations with real financial penalties, and affected employees may have the right to join class action lawsuits to recover unpaid compensation.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Mario Cortez v. Vieira Custom Chopping, Inc. from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.