Hartley v. On My Own, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- California
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved a PAGA settlement in which employer agreed to pay $575,000 (inclusive of attorneys' fees and costs) to resolve wage-and-hour violations alleged by plaintiff on behalf of 1,467 current and former employees. The settlement provided for payment to the California Labor Workforce and Development Agency and individual group members.
What This Ruling Means
Hartley v. On My Own, Inc. – Court Settlement Summary
What Happened
An employee named Hartley filed a lawsuit against On My Own Community Services and On My Own Independent Living Services, claiming the companies violated wage laws by failing to pay workers properly and refusing to make workplace adjustments for employees with disabilities. The case involved 1,467 current and former workers.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement requiring the employer to pay $575,000 to resolve the wage violations. This money went to the California Labor Workforce and Development Agency and was distributed to affected employees.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that companies can be held responsible when they underpay workers or fail to accommodate workers' needs. The large number of employees involved (1,467) demonstrates that wage violations often affect many people. When settlements like this happen, workers may receive back pay they were owed. This ruling reinforces workers' rights to fair wages and workplace accommodations under California law.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.