Skip to main content

Guri Gonzalez v. Lizbeth Corona Bautista

C.D. Cal.August 13, 2021No. 2:21-cv-04054
Plaintiff WinBoise Cascade Corporation$250 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on trespass claim and was awarded $250 in nominal damages. The court affirmed the trial court's grant of nonsuit on the invasion of privacy claim and withdrawal of punitive damages from jury consideration.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins Trespass Case Against Employer** This case involved a dispute between Guri Gonzalez, a worker, and their employer Boise Cascade Corporation over trespassing. While the specific details of what happened aren't provided in the court record excerpt, Gonzalez claimed that someone connected to the company unlawfully entered their property. The court ruled in favor of Gonzalez, finding that trespassing did occur. However, the worker was only awarded $250 in nominal damages - a small symbolic amount that acknowledges wrongdoing occurred but indicates minimal actual harm was proven. The court rejected other claims Gonzalez made, including invasion of privacy, and ruled that punitive damages (extra money meant to punish bad behavior) were not appropriate in this case. This case matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully hold employers or their representatives accountable when they cross legal boundaries, even in situations involving relatively minor violations. While the small damage award suggests the actual harm was limited, the court's decision establishes that workers have legal recourse when their property rights are violated by employer-related actions. It demonstrates that even powerful corporations must respect basic legal boundaries regarding employees' personal property.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.