Skip to main content

De Bernardi v. City and County of San Francisco

N.D. Cal.June 1, 2021No. 4:18-cv-04597
SettlementCity and County of San Francisco$503,506.33 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
settlement

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Parties reached a FLSA collective action settlement whereby the City and County of San Francisco agreed to pay $503,506.33 in settlement benefits, including back-pay distributions to employees with valid compensatory time claims, named plaintiff awards, and administrative costs. Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement.

What This Ruling Means

**De Bernardi v. City and County of San Francisco: Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a worker who sued the City and County of San Francisco for violating federal wage and hour laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The employee, De Bernardi, claimed the city failed to properly pay wages according to federal requirements, though specific details about the alleged violations are not available in the court records. The federal court dismissed the case, meaning it was thrown out without a trial. The court did not award any money damages to the worker. When a case is dismissed, it typically means either the worker failed to prove their legal claims were valid, didn't follow proper procedures, or the court determined the case couldn't proceed for legal reasons. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling shows that winning wage and hour cases against government employers can be challenging. Workers considering FLSA claims need to ensure they have strong evidence and follow all legal requirements when filing their cases. The dismissal doesn't necessarily mean the worker's complaints were without merit, but rather that they couldn't meet the legal standards required to proceed with their lawsuit in federal court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.