Skip to main content

De Bernardi v. City and County of San Francisco

N.D. Cal.March 4, 2022No. 4:18-cv-04597
SettlementCity and County of San Francisco$503,506.33 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted final approval of FLSA collective action settlement in which the City and County of San Francisco agreed to pay $503,506.33 in additional compensation to affected employees for improper calculation of regular rate of pay when cashing out or paying for compensatory time off, on top of $1.4 million in corrective payments already made.

What This Ruling Means

**De Bernardi v. City and County of San Francisco: Court Dismisses Worker's Wage Claim** A worker named De Bernardi sued the City and County of San Francisco, claiming the city violated federal wage laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act. This law requires employers to pay workers properly for their time, including overtime pay when someone works more than 40 hours per week. The court dismissed De Bernardi's case, meaning the judge threw it out without awarding any money to the worker. The court found that the worker's claims did not meet the legal requirements to move forward with the lawsuit. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows how challenging it can be for employees to successfully sue government employers over wage violations. When courts dismiss these cases, it often means the worker couldn't prove their employer actually broke the law, or there were technical legal problems with how they filed their complaint. Workers should keep detailed records of their hours worked and pay received. If you believe your employer isn't paying you correctly, consider speaking with an employment lawyer before filing a lawsuit, as these cases require strong evidence and proper legal procedures to succeed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.