Skip to main content

Frlekin v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal.December 28, 2021No. 3:13-cv-03451
SettlementApple Inc.$29,900,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted preliminary approval of a $29.9 million class settlement in a wage-and-hour case involving Apple's failure to compensate employees for time spent in mandatory bag and security checks. The settlement covers 14,683 current and former retail employees in California.

What This Ruling Means

**Apple Workers Sue Over Bag Check Time** Apple employees filed a lawsuit claiming the company violated wage and hour laws by not paying them for time spent in mandatory security bag checks. The workers argued that Apple required them to have their bags, purses, and personal devices searched when leaving work, but didn't compensate them for this time under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The case, known as Frlekin v. Apple Inc., was filed in federal court, though the final outcome is not clear from available records. The dispute centered on whether time spent in security screenings should count as paid work time, which is a common issue in retail and other industries where employers conduct bag checks to prevent theft. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights an important workplace issue - when employers require you to do something as a condition of your job, you may be entitled to pay for that time. If your employer makes you go through security checks, equipment inspections, or similar procedures before you can leave work, this time might qualify as compensable work hours. Workers facing similar situations should document the time spent and may want to research their rights under federal and state wage laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.