Skip to main content

Apple Inc. v. Rivos, Inc.

N.D. Cal.July 8, 2022No. 5:22-cv-02637
SettlementApple Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
880 Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Settled dispute in Northern District of California

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Apple Inc. and Rivos, Inc. resolved their trade secrets dispute, with Apple alleging that Rivos employees misappropriated confidential information regarding chip design and development.

What This Ruling Means

**Apple Inc. v. Rivos, Inc. - Trade Secrets Dispute** Apple sued a startup company called Rivos, claiming that former Apple employees who joined Rivos had stolen confidential information about computer chip design and development. Apple alleged these workers took trade secrets when they left the company and used that proprietary information at their new employer. The case involved multiple former Apple engineers who had moved to Rivos, which was working on similar chip technology. The court case was settled out of court, meaning both companies reached a private agreement without a judge making a final ruling. The specific terms of the settlement were not made public, and no damages were reported. This case highlights important workplace issues for employees. Workers need to be extremely careful about what information they can and cannot take when leaving a job, especially in tech industries. Confidential company information, trade secrets, and proprietary data typically must stay with the original employer. Even unintentionally using or sharing such information at a new job can lead to serious legal consequences. Employees should review their employment contracts and non-disclosure agreements carefully, and when in doubt, consult with legal counsel before starting new positions that might involve similar work.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.