Skip to main content

Foreman v. Apple, Inc.

N.D. Cal.October 3, 2023No. 3:22-cv-03902
SettlementApple, Inc.$500,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court approved a $500,000 FLSA collective action settlement in which Apple agreed to resolve claims that it failed to include all forms of compensation in overtime calculations and failed to pay for all hours worked, including unpaid travel time. The settlement is non-admitting and provides payments to opt-in plaintiffs and their counsel.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A worker named Foreman filed a lawsuit against Apple Inc., claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules about minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. While the specific details of Foreman's complaint aren't clear from the available information, FLSA violations typically involve issues like unpaid overtime, improper wage calculations, or misclassifying employees to avoid paying required wages and benefits. **What the Court Decided** The outcome of this case is unclear based on the available information. The court filing shows the case was marked as "unresolvable," but there aren't enough details to determine what this means or how the dispute was ultimately handled. **Why This Matters for Workers** Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, it highlights that workers can challenge large employers like Apple when they believe their wage and hour rights have been violated. The FLSA gives employees important protections, and workers have the right to file complaints when they think these laws have been broken. Understanding your rights under federal wage and hour laws is crucial for ensuring fair treatment at work.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.