Skip to main content

Strojnik v. Village 1017 Coronado, Inc.

S.D. Cal.April 13, 2021No. 3:19-cv-02210
Defendant WinVillage 1107 Coronado, Inc.$21,995 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Plaintiff Peter Strojnik was found in civil contempt for failing to pay $21,995 in attorney's fees awarded to Defendant Village 1107 Coronado, Inc. following dismissal of his ADA and state disability discrimination claims. The court imposed a coercive fine of $220 per day until payment is made.

What This Ruling Means

**Strojnik v. Village 1017 Coronado, Inc. - Disability Discrimination Case** **What Happened:** An employee named Strojnik filed a lawsuit against their employer, Village 1017 Coronado, Inc., claiming they faced discrimination because of a disability. The case was filed in 2021 as a civil rights lawsuit, alleging the company treated the worker unfairly due to their medical condition or disability status. **What the Court Decided:** Unfortunately, the available information doesn't include details about how the court ruled in this case or what damages, if any, were awarded to the worker. The case was processed through the court system, but the specific outcome remains unclear from the public records. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights that employees have the right to file discrimination lawsuits when they believe they've been treated unfairly because of a disability. Even when court outcomes aren't publicly detailed, these cases serve as important reminders that workers are protected by civil rights laws. Employees who face disability discrimination can take legal action against their employers, though the success of such claims depends on the specific facts and evidence in each situation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.