Skip to main content

Hadfield v. United States of America

D. Colo.November 12, 2019No. 1:18-cv-03155
Defendant WinMcDonald's
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed summary judgment in favor of McDonald's, holding that the plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care to discover and avoid a plainly visible puddle and that her claimed distractions were self-induced and not attributable to the defendant.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A worker at McDonald's slipped and fell on a puddle while at work and sued the company for negligence, claiming the employer was responsible for her injuries. The employee argued that McDonald's failed to maintain a safe workplace by not cleaning up or warning about the hazardous condition. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of McDonald's and dismissed the case. The judge found that the puddle was clearly visible and that any reasonable person should have seen it and walked around it. The court also determined that the worker was distracted by her own actions, not by anything McDonald's did, and that she didn't use ordinary care to avoid the obvious hazard. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that employees have a responsibility to watch out for obvious workplace hazards. Even when you're injured at work, you may not be able to sue your employer if the danger was clearly visible and you could have reasonably avoided it. The court expects workers to pay attention and take basic steps to protect their own safety, especially when hazards are plainly obvious.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.