Skip to main content

Blanco v. Xtreme Drilling and Coil Services, Inc.

D. Colo.July 17, 2020No. 1:16-cv-00249
Plaintiff WinWilliston Construction Company$1,362.58 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff Barlow won a jury verdict for the full amount owed under the subcontract ($1,362.58) plus interest and costs. The jury determined that the subcontract did not require Barlow to reimburse the contractor for workmen's compensation assessments charged to the contractor's account.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins Pay Dispute Over Construction Contract** This case involved a worker named Barlow who had a contract dispute with Williston Construction Company over unpaid wages totaling $1,362.58. The main disagreement was whether Barlow was required to pay back money that the company had been charged for workers' compensation insurance. The company argued that under their agreement, Barlow should reimburse them for workers' compensation costs that were added to the company's account. However, Barlow disagreed and took the matter to court, claiming the company owed him money and had stolen his wages. A jury sided completely with Barlow, awarding him the full amount he was owed ($1,362.58) plus additional money for interest and court costs. The jury determined that the contract between Barlow and the construction company did not actually require him to pay back the workers' compensation charges. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that employers cannot arbitrarily deduct costs from what they owe workers unless the contract clearly states they can do so. Workers have the right to challenge unfair deductions and can successfully recover unpaid wages through the court system when employers try to shortchange them.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.