No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff Winterwheat Marquez prevailed on her renewed motion for default judgment against AMRG Holdings and related defendants on Fair Labor Standards Act and Colorado Wage Act claims for unpaid wages and overtime violations. The court awarded damages of $1,515.59.
Marquez v. AMRG Holdings: Court Rules in Favor of Worker Over Wage Violations
What Happened
Winterwheat Marquez filed a lawsuit against AMRG Holdings, claiming the company failed to pay her all the wages she earned and did not properly compensate her for overtime work. These are common workplace violations where employers either withhold pay or don't pay the higher rates required for hours worked beyond the standard 40-hour week.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in Marquez's favor and ordered AMRG Holdings to pay her $1,515.59 in damages. The judge found that the company violated both federal wage laws (Fair Labor Standards Act) and Colorado's state wage protection laws.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot simply ignore wage requirements. Workers have legal protections at both federal and state levels to ensure they receive full payment and proper overtime compensation. If your employer fails to pay you correctly, you can pursue legal action—and if the company doesn't respond properly to the lawsuit, courts can side with workers and award damages to make things right.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Marquez from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.