Waldschmidt v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Colorado
- Circuit
- Tenth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant the defendant's motion to dismiss, leaving only the plaintiff's individual disparate treatment and disparate impact claims. The court found that the plaintiff's removal from service on April 25, 2018 was a discrete act subject to a 300-day filing deadline, and because the EEOC charge was not filed within that period, most claims are time-barred.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.