Skip to main content

Ullom v. Bill Perry & Associates, Inc.

M.D. Fla.December 11, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00266
DismissedBill Perry & Associates, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court denied plaintiff's motion for default judgment without prejudice, finding that the complaint failed to adequately allege FLSA coverage and that conditional certification of the collective action was required before default judgment could be entered.

What This Ruling Means

Ullom v. Bill Perry & Associates, Inc.

What Happened

An employee filed a lawsuit against Bill Perry & Associates, Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage laws by not properly paying workers. The employee asked the court to automatically rule in their favor without a trial (called a default judgment).

What the Court Decided

The court rejected the employee's request. The judge found two main problems: First, the complaint didn't provide enough details about whether the federal Fair Labor Standards Act actually applied to the company. Second, the court said the employee needed to follow a specific legal process for wage lawsuits involving multiple workers before asking for a default judgment.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case shows that wage theft lawsuits require proper procedures and clear information about the employer's coverage under federal law. Workers pursuing these cases must carefully document their claims and follow the correct steps, which can include getting other affected employees involved. Simply filing a complaint isn't enough—courts require employers to have a fair opportunity to respond before making automatic rulings.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Ullom from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.