No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties settled a Fair Labor Standards Act unpaid overtime claim. The plaintiff received full back pay plus liquidated damages, and the case was dismissed with prejudice.
Pena-Cintra v. Ameriglass Engineering, Inc.
What Happened
An employee at Ameriglass Engineering, Inc. filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to pay overtime wages required by federal law. The worker alleged wage theft—that the employer did not properly compensate him for extra hours worked beyond the standard 40-hour work week.
What the Court Decided
Rather than go to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement. The employee received full back pay for unpaid overtime, plus additional damages (called "liquidated damages"), which essentially doubled the compensation owed. The case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that employers must pay overtime wages as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act. Workers who suspect they haven't been paid fairly for overtime hours have legal options. Settlement outcomes like this one show that courts take wage theft seriously and may award workers not only the money they're owed, but additional penalties to compensate for the violation. If you believe your employer underpaid your overtime, documenting your hours and consulting with an employment professional may help protect your rights.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.