Crayton v. Sailormen, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Georgia
- Circuit
- Eleventh Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement between plaintiff Crayton and defendant Sailormen, Inc. regarding unpaid overtime wages under the FLSA. The case was dismissed with prejudice.
What This Ruling Means
Crayton v. Sailormen, Inc. — Case Summary
What Happened
Crayton filed a lawsuit against Sailormen, Inc., claiming the company failed to pay overtime wages required by federal law. This type of violation is commonly called wage theft—when employers don't pay workers for the extra hours they worked.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement between Crayton and Sailormen, Inc. Both sides agreed to resolve the dispute without going to trial. The case was dismissed "with prejudice," meaning it cannot be refiled. While specific damage amounts weren't publicly reported, the settlement indicates Crayton received compensation for the unpaid overtime.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that federal overtime laws have real teeth. When workers aren't paid for overtime hours, they can take legal action and potentially recover what they're owed. Companies that violate these wage requirements may face settlements and lawsuits. If you believe your employer hasn't paid you properly for overtime, you have legal options to pursue compensation.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.