Skip to main content

Hickey v. Protective Life Corporation

C.D. Ill.September 17, 2019No. 3:18-cv-03018
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
751 Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The defendant Safeway prevailed on all claims. The court reversed lower court judgments and rendered judgment that the plaintiff take nothing, finding insufficient evidence that the store manager actually discovered the plaintiff's perilous position as required under Texas discovered peril doctrine.

What This Ruling Means

**Hickey v. Protective Life Corporation: What This Means for Workers** This case involved a workplace injury at a Safeway store. An employee was hurt and sued the company for negligence, claiming that a store manager knew the employee was in danger but failed to act to prevent the injury. Under Texas law, employers can be held responsible if they actually discover that a worker is in a dangerous situation and don't take steps to help. The court ruled in favor of Safeway and against the injured employee. The judges found there wasn't enough evidence to prove that the store manager actually knew the employee was in immediate danger when the injury occurred. Because the employee couldn't demonstrate that the manager had actual knowledge of the perilous situation, the negligence claim failed under Texas's "discovered peril doctrine." **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows how difficult it can be to win negligence cases against employers in Texas. Workers must prove not only that they were injured, but also that their supervisor or manager actually knew they were in danger at the time. Simply being in a potentially dangerous situation isn't enough – there must be clear evidence that management was aware of the specific risk.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.