Skip to main content

Leskovisek v. Illinois Department of Transportation

C.D. Ill.December 11, 2020No. 3:17-cv-03251
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationConstructive Discharge

Outcome

The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the lower courts and held the employer liable for quid pro quo sexual harassment and constructive discharge when a supervisor used his managerial powers to rape a subordinate employee.

What This Ruling Means

**Leskovisek v. Illinois Department of Transportation: Court Rules Against Employer in Sexual Harassment Case** This case involved a female employee who experienced severe sexual harassment from her supervisor at Nation Wide Security Services, Inc. The supervisor used his position of authority to sexually assault the employee, creating such an intolerable work environment that she felt forced to quit her job. The Michigan Supreme Court ruled in favor of the employee, finding the company liable for both quid pro quo sexual harassment and constructive discharge. The court determined that when a supervisor uses managerial power to commit sexual assault against a subordinate, the employer is responsible. The court also recognized that the workplace became so hostile that the employee had no reasonable choice but to leave, which legally counts as being fired (constructive discharge). This ruling is significant for workers because it confirms that employers cannot escape responsibility when supervisors abuse their authority to sexually harass employees. It also reinforces that workers who are forced to quit due to severe harassment can still pursue legal claims as if they were wrongfully terminated. The decision sends a clear message that companies must be held accountable for creating safe workplaces free from sexual harassment and assault.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.