Skip to main content

Schindler v. Marriott International

N.D. Ill.April 25, 2018No. 1:17-cv-05805
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to AccommodateWrongful Termination

Outcome

Court granted in part and denied in part defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's termination claim and reasonable accommodation claim were dismissed with prejudice; failure to hire and retaliation claims survived the motion to dismiss and case proceeded.

What This Ruling Means

Schindler v. Marriott International Summary

What Happened

Schindler filed a lawsuit against Marriott International claiming discrimination, retaliation, failure to accommodate a disability, and wrongful termination. The company asked the court to throw out the entire case before trial.

What the Court Decided

The court partially agreed with Marriott. The judge dismissed Schindler's claims about wrongful termination and failure to provide reasonable workplace accommodations, meaning those claims could not move forward. However, the court allowed two claims to continue: the failure to hire claim and the retaliation claim. This meant the case proceeded to the next stage for those remaining issues.

Why This Matters for Workers

This ruling shows that courts carefully examine each claim separately in discrimination cases. While Schindler lost some arguments, the survival of the retaliation and failure-to-hire claims meant the case could continue. For workers facing similar situations, this illustrates that having multiple claims gives different chances of success—some may be dismissed while others advance toward trial or settlement.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.